Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Why The Peaceful Majority Is Irrelevant

By Paul E. Marek

H/t Norm Sutherland

This article was written to try and help people avoid repeating history over and over again.

Paul E. Marek is a second-generation Canadian, whose grandparents fled Czechoslovakia just prior to the Nazi takeover. He wrote the following article in February of 2006.  it is a critique not of radical Muslim, but of the peace loving Muslims, who refuse to reign it in.

In its simplest terms, what follows is an expansion of the George Santayana quote, "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
I used to know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War Two. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.

“Very few people were true Nazis” he said, “but, many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.”

We are told again and again by “experts” and “talking heads” that Islam is the religion of peace, and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unquantified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the specter of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is, that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars world wide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. The hard quantifiable fact is, that the “peaceful majority” is the “silent majority” and it is cowed and extraneous.

Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The Average Japanese individual prior to World War 2 was not a war mongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of Killing that included the systematic killing of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And, who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were “peace loving”.

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by the fanatics. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Bosnians, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others, have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts; the fanatics who threaten our way of life.
Is anybody listening out there?

What Mr. Marek wrote is not politically correct, though historically accurate.  Which is more important, to know and act upon the truth, or to pretend to say all the right things for the time?  Bravo Mr. Marek.


JOSHUA said...

What Mr. Marek DOES NOT investigate is at the crux of the issue.

Islamic spokespersons and their apologists always describe Islam it as the religion of peace. What is not explained is what is understood to mean "peace" in Islam.

In Islamic theology (if you wish to accord it that much respect) defines "peace" as being the result of living in an Islamic theocracy (i.e. Shari'a Law). Hence "peace" is only available to Muslims.

All kinds of words are given new definitions in Islamic "scriptures" (if you wish to accord them such respect), the Koran, Suras and Hadiths.

For example, "slander", "calumny" and a whole whack of other words are given a totally different spin in Islam.

Michael Brandon said...

If you expand upon your comment here, I will publish it, though I hazard a guess that there is a risk of an HRC complaint in presenting the truth, if somebody gets their feelings hurt.

Geert Wilders comes to mind.

But the Truth will set us free.